It became clear to me then that the main reason I could not decode completely this important work (and most other abstract paintings) because there is almost nothing in the painting looks familiar to me (based on MY knowledge and experience.) That is, if the artist and I do not share similar experience and can’t communicate in some common languages, and if there is no supplemental information or “translation”, how could I possibly hope to understand what the artist is saying through his/her work? Indeed how is this any different from other situations when we are confronted with something foreign and outside of our expertise or experience? With such a realization, I no longer feel intimidated. I realized that I can in fact do better. I can learn a little more the context and the language of the artists to communicate with them through their work.
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Inventing Abstraction
When meeting an
abstract painting, my first reaction is usually “What are you saying?!” When I attempted an abstract painting for
the first time, it dawned on me that I did not even know where
to begin; it is so much easier to paint something real. Why is it so hard to appreciate abstract art?
My Aha moment came
when we went to the exhibition Inventing Abstraction, 1910–1925 at the MoMA (Museum of Modern Art) in New
York on Feb 17th on the 100th anniversary of the legendary
1913 Armory
Show in New York City when modern
European art was first introduced to the public in United States.
As one walks into
the gallery of this special exhibit on MoMA’s top floor, you are greeted by a
1910 painting of the master artist Pablo Picasso (see photo below on the left, sourced from Google Image). If you try to search for a clue to figure out
the subject of this painting, you may barely identify an object at the lower
center of the painting that looks like a mandolin. The rest of the painting however looks more
like mumble jumbles no matter how pleasing and appealing to our visual senses. If I tell you the title of this painting is “Woman with a Mandolin”, you may possibly
convince yourself and others, after the fact, that the forms and lines above
and behind the mandolin could be a woman figure (could it be a man?). If I
show you a pre-cursor entitled “Girl with
a Mandolin” that Picasso had done earlier in that Spring of 1910 (see photo
below on the right), does everything make more sense to you now?
It became clear to me then that the main reason I could not decode completely this important work (and most other abstract paintings) because there is almost nothing in the painting looks familiar to me (based on MY knowledge and experience.) That is, if the artist and I do not share similar experience and can’t communicate in some common languages, and if there is no supplemental information or “translation”, how could I possibly hope to understand what the artist is saying through his/her work? Indeed how is this any different from other situations when we are confronted with something foreign and outside of our expertise or experience? With such a realization, I no longer feel intimidated. I realized that I can in fact do better. I can learn a little more the context and the language of the artists to communicate with them through their work.
The painting “Woman with a Mandolin” was fittingly placed
at the entrance of this exhibition because it was a bifurcation point in
Western modern art. It represents the
furthest Picasso had gone in his works in terms of the level of abstraction. While
many artists had continued to pursue abstraction in various ways at the time, Picasso
chose instead to add back more (fragments) of figurative representations (or what
he called “attributes”) to his subsequent
works including those that defined Cubism, the most
influential art movement of 20th century. One of his famous quotes was that “There is no abstract art. You must always
start with something.” Many art
historians had noted that Picasso believed strongly in maintaining the connection
between his work and the things in real world.
Turning to the right
after viewing Picasso’s “Woman with a Mandolin”, one sees another historical
painting - Wassily Kandinsky’s 1911 “Impression
III (Concert)” (see photo on the right, sourced from Google Image). Again, if you
did not know the title nor the context of the work, it would be extremely
difficult to guess what the objects of the painting represent. With the help of the title, most viewers
would probably have guessed correctly the large black form in the painting is a
piano and those smaller slim figures are orchestra and the audience.
But what about the
big yellow patch that takes up almost a third of the canvas? It turns
out this warm bright color depicts Arnold Schoenberg’s music. Kandinsky, being the leading theorist advocating
abstraction at the time, had actually been struggling to create abstract painting. The breakthrough came when he attended the
concert of Schoenberg’s Second
String Quartet Op. 10 in Munich on
Jan.2nd, 1911. What
Schoenberg had achieved and demonstrated was a new type of music that is
atonal. In particular, the last movement
of this string quartet has no key signature and is devoid of diatonic harmonies
found in traditional music (thus again, unfamiliar to most). Inspired by the new style, Kandinsky sketched
out that evening the painting Impression
III (Concert) that demonstrated abstract visual presentation of color, form
and lines can be “ just as abstract,
emotional, and spiritual as Schoenberg's music!” How is this any different from the story
that Steve Chu got the idea of his Nobel Prize work in cooling and trapping
atoms with laser light when he saw snow flakes coming down from his office
window at the Bell Labs?
One might question
what is left if one pushes the process of abstraction to the limit through reduction,
simplification and indirection? Some
artists did exactly that. Not only narratives
can be absent, colors can be removed, forms can be reduced, lines can be dropped,
and title can be “untitled”. In this
exhibit, Russian Suprematist
Kazimir Malevich’s 1918 painting White on White serves a good illustration
of abstract works that show “pure
artistic feeling rather than on visual depiction of objects”. How far is it from the ultimate “nothing
represents nothing”?
Nelson Goodman discussed
the term abstract on Grove Art Online:
“Since an abstract work is one without
representation, or more generally denotation, the question naturally arises
what an abstract verbal or linguistic work may be, a text that says nothing, a
story that does not tell a story, a poem that does not speak of anything. Like
a picture that does not picture, these works are deprived of a normal
denotative function and refer directly by showing rather than saying, as by
exemplifying patterns or expressing feelings…” As a student of art, I certainly feel more
comfortable with Picasso’s ideas on abstraction. If ALL familiar forms are removed and the
links to figurative representation of objects are absent, what are we left
with? What and how could I communicate beyond
the mere raw emotion with others through the work?
Of course, abstract
art in a broader sense is not new and has been in existence since the early
days of the human history. It has been
and continues to be reinvented all the time in many corners of the earth in
varying contexts, media with different tools.
One example is a recent calligraphy work by Dong YangZi 董陽孜in Taiwan (see photo below). Can you tell what the characters are? How critical is it? I was told that Art comes first! Indeed, it
is no different from in music where music
comes first. How critical is the
lyrics when you first hear a song that touches your nerves and evoked your
unknown emotions? Did you enjoy some Italian
operas any less because you did not understand Italian?
What I have also
learned from the exhibit is that the development of abstract art did not happen
as a result of few geniuses dreamed up an approach and style in isolation from their
studios. The opposite was true. The creative process was not unlike today’s races
in bleeding edge applied science and technology. Artists discussed and debated each other in bars,
café and by mail from concept, theory to experiment. They stood on the shoulders of masters like Paul Cézanne and challenged the tradition and the status-quo. They explored and experimented; they competed
and pushed each other to the brink.
Their social networks were not limited to fellow artists as illustrated
in the chart to the right from the exhibit. They included poets, writers, composers
and tool inventors, a true inter-disciplinary venture as what we might call it today.
Whether you feel comfortable with abstract
art, I think you would agree that it was an exciting period in history. I think you will enjoy it more and more as
you spend more time with it.
Talk to you soon!
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The High Line – time out at New York City
The High
Line at the west side of New York City is an unusual linear park. At this time, it is a free public park at one
mile long with narrow walkway south of 30th street between 10th
and 11th Ave. Unlike typical
linear parks, the High Line is elevated at 30 feet high, cutting through and
standing in between two large avenues of the city.
New York city did not actually spend big bucks to build an elevated
city park from scratch. The structure used
to be a section of the West Side Freight Line built
in mid 19th century by the Hudson River Railroad, connecting southern
Manhattan through midtown all the way north to Albany, the capital of New York
State 150 miles away. In 1934, the
section south of Penn Station at 34th street was relocated west from
street level along 10th Ave to a 30 feet high structure, thus the
name “High Line”, to avoid the frequent traffic accidents and to make loading
and unloading of goods easier. Who would
have thought in only few decades, the hyper growth of the trucking and highway
systems supplanted the rail transportations.
While the north section of the West Side Line beyond Penn Station is
still used by Amtrak, the elevated High Line was abandoned in 1980 and left with
weeds and rust till recent years.
Climbing up staircases at west of the intersection of 10th
Ave and 30th street and turning right, you can see the last section
of the High Line Park under construction that is scheduled to open in 2013. From here, the High Line turns west towards to
the Hudson River and will take visitors through the West Side Rail Yards to 34th
street.
Turning left, one can start the journey south and stroll
down the new section of the park which was opened a little over a year ago in
summer of 2011. As one walks south,
ornamental grasses greet the visitors along with few surviving blooms of cone flowers. Less than few hundred feet, a gigantic mural of
a man, Brandon Many Ribs of a North Dakota Indian tribe, overlooks the High
Line with eyes closed. He appears to be screaming
silently, possibly due to intrusions by the visitors. This is a recent work by the award winning French
street artist JR from his participatory Inside Out Project.
Near 27th street, another mural “The High Line
Zoo” by Jordan Betten and his team is at display on a roof top next to the High
Line. For some unknown reasons, the zoo
animals are all gone from the roof when I compared my photo against that of
the original display found on the net (see photos to the right).
When High Line was built as an elevated railroad 80 years
ago, it was deliberately made to travel in between 10th and 11th
Ave. As a result, a few high rises had
to make ways allowing freight train to tunnel through the buildings. Some of these
tunnels are now places for street performances and some exhibits. It was such an enjoyment to hear a cellist
play when I was visiting. Other than
taking a sip of water and wiping off his sweats on his face, he was totally
immersed in the music and oblivious to the occasional deposit of changes into his
cello case by visitors.
Walking back north, I
stopped by the Blue Bottle Coffee near
the Upper Chelsea Market Passage at the 15th street. I joined the line, waiting patiently for a cup
of fresh “hand-made” drip coffee. I was
curious if the coffee would taste any better as I watched the barista
painstakingly pouring rounds of hot water into each holder attentively.
The High Line of New York city is not the first elevated linear
park. The idea in fact came from The
Promenade plantée of Paris which is a 2.9 miles long walkway
completed in 1993. The High Line has however
inspired many other cities in U.S. and elsewhere such as Philadelphia, Chicago,
St. Luis and Rotterdam to pursue
conversions of abandoned city railroads into green space with the hope that
they will attract and spur further neighborhood redevelopment.
perhaps the most impressive part of the story of the High Line Park of New York is that the project started as a result of the activism of neighborhood residents and is a true grass-root movement. There were competing ideas by businessmen and property owners in 80s and 90s to demolish the elevated structure in favor of traditional redevelopment. In 1999, two neighborhood residents and activists Joshua David and Robert Hammond founded the Friends of the High Line and championed the efforts and mobilized the community as well as city administrators and politicians to save the High Line. The result was nothing short of a miracle as (what some would consider) a pie in the sky was successfully turned into a “park in the sky”. To this date, a major part of the park maintenance is supported by the Foundation and volunteers. It has already attracted more than $2 billion dollars of new development to the area around it for residential units, office and commercial spaces. While the notion of “build a cool park, they will come” may sound naïve, the success of High Line park has become as a shining example of how a nice green space can revitalize city neighborhoods. For more details about the High Line including history, timeline, and photos, you can visit its official website at http://www.thehighline.org/.
Enjoy your walk and talk to you soon!
Friday, October 5, 2012
North to Alaska
For those who’d like to be
close to and to appreciate wilderness, Alaska is a top destination of choice. It holds more than half of the designated
wilderness area of U.S. and yet accessible by plane, car, and sea. For tourists who have a modest budget and
time but can’t quite stay away from modern facilities and some pampering, one
way to enjoy Alaska is to take a 7 night one-way cruise from Vancouver to
Anchorage for the southeast region of Alaska, aka Alaska Panhandle.
Then one can rent and pick up a car at Anchorage to visit the south
central and central regions of Alaska for places like the Kenai Peninsula and the
Denali National Park. That is what we just
did in late summer.
The name Alaska means “the Great Land” that came from Aleut people who are the indigenous
people of the Aleutian Islands of Alaska.
Situated at the northwest corner of North America and disjoint from the
rest of the U.S., Alaska has an area more than of 600 thousand square miles
which accounts for almost 20% of U.S. and is bigger than most countries of the
world. With a slightly more than 700 thousands
residents, it is also one of the least populated states of U.S. Unlike most states in U.S., Alaska has more
males than females. With its unique
natural resources and climate however, there is a popular joke about Alaska men:
“The odds are good, but the goods are odd.”
Some trivia: What is the north-most
state of U.S.? How about west-most and
east-most? How about the largest state
by area? How about the least densely
populated state? Yes, Alaska is the correct answer for all of the questions
above. (You may quip how could a state
be the west-most and east-most at the same time? Well, technically, parts of Alaska are in eastern
hemisphere and span from longitude 172° to 180° east of the Prime Meridian that
passes through Greenwich, England.) To
give you some idea of the extremes, the population density of New York City is
about 25,000 times more than that of Alaska which stands at 1.26 per square
mile.
Alaska used to be a part of
Russian Empire’s territory. It was sold
to U.S. on 1867 for a mere $7.2 million dollars (equivalent to $120 millions
today) when the Tsar Alexander II made the strategic move using U.S.
to mitigate Great Britain’s threat from its east who controlled British Columbia
at the time.
Did you know that Japan had
invaded and occupied a part of Alaska (then a U.S. territory) during WWII? Yes, Japanese did more to U.S. than attacking the Pearl Harbor. Six months after the Pearl Harbor attack, Japanese
force landed and occupied two of the Alaskan islands - Attu and Kiska of the Aleutian Islands in mid 1942. It wasn’t until almost a year later that American
and allied forces reclaimed those islands with heavy casualties on both
sides.
Historically, Alaska was the first
entry point of humans into the Americas when some groups crossed the Bering land bridge
from Asia during the ice age more than 10,000 years ago. Over time, some moved south, settled throughout
the Americas, and are now referred to as the Indigenous peoples of the Americas whose similarity in features
to Asian offers a clue.
With a vast territory and northern location (the
north most location of Alaska is about 1000 miles from the North Pole), one
usually associates extreme colds with Alaska.
In reality, the climate of Alaska varies a lot depending on the regions. For instance, the southeastern region which
is the popular destination of Alaskan cruises is not much cooler than Seattle
or Western Europe. And Anchorage’s
climate is reasonably mild although due to its latitude, there can be as little
as 5 hours of daylight in the winter. On
the other hand, by some estimates, Alaska does have three million lakes and more
than 100,000 or roughly half of the world’s glaciers.
Typical Alaska cruise itinerary includes visit to Ketchikan, Juneau and Skagway
from south to north on its ports of call.
Juneau is the capital of Alaska but is not accessible from Alaskan
roadway system. The other two towns are
small enough for easy strolls and exploration by foot. While Ketchikan has many wildlife to show
for – from salmon to bald eagles, Skagway is full of colorful human stories and
history, thanks to the Klondike gold rush of 1896. It was the port from where prospectors
prepared for and started their 500-mile journey to the gold fields in Canada. Some never made it to the gold fields and many
never made it back. Very few became
rich. Of course, the real smart ones “mine
the miners” and became wealthy without nearly as much hardship (Now you
understand why people want to work in Wall Street?).
Land excursions at those towns through cruise
companies or independent operators offer opportunities to get close to natural
beauties as well as wild animals such as salmon, bald eagle, grizzly bear, and
humpback whale. More adventurous minded
tourists could also try glacier/ice field trekking, kayaking, rafting, etc. Further north from Skagway, scenic cruising
of Glacier Bay National Park and the College Fjord adds acclamations to the week-long
cruise as majestic glaciers meet the sea water.
For some reasons, our memory of Glacier Bay was different and better
from our first visit a decade ago. The
cruise ship we were on shut the engines and let us enjoy the views and sounds
in complete silence. I can still remember
hearing the sound of crumbling glaciers from miles away with occasional cheers
when one actually sees something.
Otherwise, passengers were mostly whispering as if everyone was afraid
of disturbing the nature. Below are a
few selected photos that I took for your enjoyment. To enlarge, simply left click on the photo.
| Mendenhall Glacier |
| Auke Bay |
| Juneau Port from Mt Roberts Tram |
| Juneau Cruise Port |
| Auke Bay, north of Juneau |
| Sea Lions in Auke Bay |
| Humpback Whales in Auke Bay |
| Margerie Glacier in Glacier Bay |
The disembarkation point of our cruise was Whittier
which is 60 miles southeast of Anchorage. As we stepped out of the cruise ship in early
morning, stunningly beautiful Whittier harbor and nearby mountains veiled in
fog greeted us. Not far from the cruise
terminal, there lies the 2.5 miles long Anton Anderson Memorial Tunnel in one
lane shared by both cars and trains. It
is the second longest highway tunnel of North America (50 ft shorter than the
Ted Williams+I-90 extension in Boston) and is the only land access of Whittier to
the outside world through the Portage Glacier Highway.
The short drive through the Portage Glacier Highway was breathtaking. We in fact returned to the area a few days later for more photo shoots and hikes to see the lake and glaciers. 20 miles west, Portage Glacier road meets the Seward Highway which is a part of Alaska Route 1. If you turn left and heads west-southwest, you can explore the heart of Kenai Peninsula. Turning right and head north, you soon see Turnagain Arm to your left with Anchorage at the far north of the mouth of the Arm at more than 30 miles away. Turnagain Arm is one of the about five dozen places in the world where one can see tidal bore. (but it is not nearly as impressive as the one at Qiantang River of China which has the world's largest bore - up to 30 ft high and moving at up to 25 miles per hour.) During high tides, pods of Beluga whales or white whales (ok, it is a misnomer and is really more like dolphins) follow and chase the silver salmon all the way upstream from Cook Inlet. It is not difficult to spot some of these cute mammals along the highway, one of the only two places in North America where you can watch Beluga whales in the wild.
![]() |
| Turnagain Arm northward |
| Alaska Fireweed |
| Turnagain Arm when low tide |
Continuing north on Alaska Route 1 past Anchorage, a mere 30 miles out, one reaches Wasilla which is a small suburban town of Anchorage with less than 8,000 residents. It is now internationally known, thanks to Sarah Palin who was its mayor from 1996 till 2002. She was elected as the Governor of Alaska in 2006 and became the Republican Party nominee for Vice President in the 2008 election. To boost her credential on international affairs, Sarah Palin had made the famous statement: "They're our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska." Although the statement was technically correct, it was such a stretch from her demonstrated intellects and experiences that the statement became a constant joke of her ignorance of foreign affairs.
Picking up Alaska Route 3, aka the George Parks Highway after
Wasilla and going north along the imposing Alaska
Range at the west, one can enjoy a pleasant drive to Denali National Park
200 miles away. The word
"Denali" came from the native Athabaskan language. It means "the high one", referring to the Mount Denali of the park. It is also known as Mount McKinley, named after
president William McKinley of Ohio in 1897. Mount Denali is the highest mountain of North
America. Peaked at 20,327 ft, it is simply
a gigantic piece of granite that was lifted up into the sky from Denali Fault
as a result of tectonic activities over 10's of millions of years.
Denali National Park and Reserve has more than 4
million acres in area and is the third largest national park of U.S. Because of the low temperature and short
growth seasons, Denali National Park has little wooded areas. Instead, tundra at various
elevations with beautiful fall colors covered much of the ground no matter at which
directions you look. There is only one
Park Road of 91 miles long that takes one from the park entrance to the mining
camp of Kantishna. The first 15 miles is
open to private vehicles. The remaining
76 miles of narrow gravel road is only accessible by Park concessionary buses. A round-trip bus ride with short stops along
the way all the way to Kantishna would be a 12+ hours venture. The reward though is the spectacular sceneries
and possible encounters with wildlife – grizzly bears, mountain sheep, moose,
and more. One new thing I learned from
watching a film at the visitor center was the most impressive camouflage I have ever seen. Look at the photos below and
compare the Willow Ptarmigans (the state bird of Alaska) in late Aug that we
saw and a photo of a Ptarmigan in winter that I downloaded from Internet!
More selected photos follow them below. With a three-night stays, we barely scratch the surface. Next time, we hope we have a better luck with the weather and have more time to hike at various parts of the park.
| A lone grizzly bear |
| A lone visitor |
| Eielson Visitor Center |
| Wonder Lake |
| Mount McKingley seen from Alaska Route 1 |
Before I go, I should say a few words about food. Material wise, you can’t go wrong with fresh local salmon and halibut. But if you are not sure about the joint, simply order entrees that retain the original flavor as much as possible. We have had decent food at most of the places we visited including the café in the Denali Park. We also had a wonderful outdoor lunch break and leisure walk at Talkeetna on the way to Denali from Anchorage. It is a lovely small town with quite a few cozy restaurants. I had Caribou Chili and a special Ale made with Fireweed honey. With 9% alcohol, that Ale was the strongest beer I have ever had but is very good. The Caribou Chili was nicely done too. It didn't taste gamey as one might fear. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that restaurants in U.S., as required by law, can only serve game meats that are farm-raised?
Talk to you soon!
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Cheat to Thrive
Recent news reports of large
scale academic cheating at top schools like Stuyvesant High School in New York
City and Harvard University have drawn a lot of attentions. In the recent NY Times article Studies
Find More Students Cheating, With High Achievers No Exception by Richard
Perez-Pena, Professor Donald L. McCabe of the Rutgers University
Business School who is a leading researcher on cheating was quoted to say “There have always been struggling students who
cheat to survive. But more and more,
there are students at the top who cheat to thrive.” He may be right that there have been more
reported incidents or such a trend indicated by surveys. However, sorry to sound cynical, should we be
surprised if there have always been people “at the top”, students or not, who cheat to thrive?
b : to violate rules dishonestly. Wikipedia article on cheating gives it a broad definition: “an immoral
way of achieving a goal. It is generally used for the breaking of rules to gain
advantage in a competitive situation. Cheating is the getting of reward for
ability by dishonest means.”
There are several critical
words in these definitions that warrant closer
examinations.
What is considered immoral?
Is it a function of particular community and time? Who define the rules and how are rules upheld and enforced? Are the criteria of cheating
absolute or relative? What if there is
no reward involved? What if the underlying
situation is not competitive? Is the
same behavior now still
considered cheating?
For the recent Harvard
scandal (see NY Times article Harvard
Says 125 Students May Have Cheated on Exam), the
professor did tell the students that they must work alone in the take-home
open-book, open-internet final exam.
When the professor saw the similarity of the answers in many of the
papers submitted, he did the right thing and reported the incident to the
administration who opened the investigation.
For the Stuyvesant High School scandal (see NY Times article Allegations
of Widespread Cheating), the scandal became public when the Principal
confiscated a student’s cell phone during a city language exam and uncovered
evidences of widespread cheating.
Are these students “cheat to survive” – to survive
in a highly competitive environment?
Note even at Stuyvesant and Harvard, by definition, half of the students
are below median in their class! Since the
cheats appeared to be “business as usual” to many of the students involved
according to the reports, I would guess at least many of the offending students
belong to the group of “cheat to thrive”.
Thus a more sombering question is what is happening
with our society as a whole? Is there a
trend of increasing moral delinquency especially among the elites? Is
this just a tip of the iceberg? After all, these are not isolated incidents
and students have not been the only ones caught cheating. Only a little more than a year ago, 178
Atlanta public school teachers and principals were accused of altering students’
grades in high-stake standardized tests.
As many have observed, technology and tool advances
have made cheating easier. Obvious example
is cell phones with camera and texting. Copy
and paste features in word processing software allows people to lift others’
writings effortlessly. Further, there
are abundant resources online at our finger tips. With powerful search engines, one can plagiarize
any subject matter even at advanced levels.
All in all, the popularity and ease of sharing over Internet have eroded
the time-honored respect for originality, authorship and ownership. I have seen highly educated and accomplished
adults lifting regularly others’ work in their communications without
attributions. While one may argue that there
are no explicit or direct rewards in some of these cases, one cannot stop
wondering what kind of role models and what effects would it have on next generations?
Misguided promotion of group
work in school is also a suspect. Group
work sometimes does degenerate into straightforward copying and sharing of
final outputs and credit without division of work and responsibility. To some, the lesson learned from team work is
how to get more easy awards by taking others’ credits instead of the true
meaning of collaboration that one plus one can be bigger than 2 and that it is
the only way to work a complex problems effectively.
Competition
for reward and satisfaction is certainly a huge factor in inducing cheating
behaviors, especially for the elites. A
famous example can be found in the NOVA program Secret of Photo 51 that details the history of Rosalind
Franklin's contributions in the discovery of the double helix
structure of DNA. The 1962 Nobel Prize
in Physiology or Medicine was given to James Watson, Francis Crick and
Maurice Wilkins who, along with their Lab directors, knowingly neglected to mention
that their successful discovery and breakthrough model was critically dependent
on Franklin’s experimental results to which they had obtained access without
her permission. I am sure you have no problem finding plenty examples
in politics and business world where people constantly dance between the fine legal
and ethical lines. In his Sept 24th New York magazine article Cheating Upwards,
Robert Kolder had an in-depth profile about Nayeem Ahsan, the Stuyvesant High
junior who was in the center of the recent cheating scandal. Do you know what
was his dream college? Yes, it was Harvard.
Do you know what his dream career is? It is investment banker. Should we be surprised that there is less and
less trust the public have on our political and business leaders?
Why do people cheat? I can think of
many reasons and you can too: no one is watching, others do it (and I would be
disadvantaged if I don’t), the reward is worth the risk of getting caught and
the possible penalty if caught, the thrills and pleasure, help a friend in
need, it won’t really hurt others, and because I can, just to name a few. Sadly, cheating appears to be universal throughout
human history in all civilizations. Let
us be honest. A vast majority of us do have the temptation to cheat from time to time (Perhaps, it comes from our survival and competitive instinct?). Given that, and given that a
dominating factor in cheating is how easy it is and how high the penalty is, the
solution seems clear. More transparent
process, more safeguards, raise penalty and enforce the rules. Success should be commended but cheat to
thrive must not be tolerated.
Talk to you soon!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







